Elmira's population has fallen by half since 1950. Its property tax rate is among the
highest in New York State. This didn't happen by accident — four identifiable forces
drove it: the collapse of manufacturing, a catastrophic flood and its mishandled
recovery, the departure of white middle-class residents, and a decade of state and
county fiscal arrangements that compounded the damage.
A City That Once Grew
Elmira grew steadily from the Civil War through World War II, reaching its
peak population of nearly 50,000 in 1950. The decline began before 1972, before
the flood, before the factory closures announced in headlines. It has been nearly
uninterrupted for 70 years.
49,716Peak population — 1950
26,523Population in 2020 — down 47% from peak
−23,193People lost since 1950
30.2%Residents below poverty line (ACS 2024 5-yr) — vs ~14% statewide
Year
Population
Change
Context
1920
45,993
—
Manufacturing boom; Erie Railroad hub
1930
47,397
+3.1%
1940
45,106
−4.8%
Depression-era contraction
1950
49,716
+10.2%
Peak — postwar industrial employment
1960
46,517
−6.4%
Suburban highway development begins
1970
39,945
−14.1%
Manufacturing contraction underway; flood not yet
1980
35,327
−11.6%
Post-flood; factory closures accelerating
1990
33,724
−4.5%
2000
30,940
−8.3%
2010
29,200
−5.6%
2020
26,523
−9.2%
2023 est.
26,176
−1.3%
ACS estimate
Sources: U.S. Decennial Census; ACS 2023 1-year estimate
The Manufacturing Base Collapsed
Elmira's economy was built on heavy manufacturing — fire trucks, electrical equipment,
railroad infrastructure, machine tools. Starting in the late 1950s and accelerating
through the 1980s, those employers contracted or left entirely. The city lost its
economic foundation in a single generation.
1873–1985
American LaFrance — Fire truck manufacturer founded in Elmira, one of
the city's largest employers for over a century. Elmira plant closed 1985.
1960s–80s
General Electric, Westinghouse, American Bridge (U.S. Steel), Remington Rand,
Ann Page (A&P) — All contracted or left the area during the recession and
post-industrial restructuring of the 1970s–80s.
1950s–70s
Route 17 / I-86 highway corridor — The Southern Tier Expressway made
suburban commuting practical. Residents who could afford to leave for Horseheads,
Big Flats, or Southport did so — taking their property tax payments with them.
Between 1950 and 1970, Horseheads village grew from 3,600 to 7,989; Big Flats from
2,460 to 6,837. Elmira lost 14% of its population over those same two decades.
June 1972
Hurricane Agnes — The flood — The Chemung River flooded all of
downtown Elmira. Two of the city's four bridges were knocked out — the Walnut Street
bridge partly collapsed — leaving Lake Street and Madison Avenue standing; the
National Guard held Lake Street for emergency vehicles and funneled all civilian
traffic onto Madison Avenue. The city was already losing population and industry
when the flood hit; it accelerated both.
1972–76
The recovery that didn't rebuild — The New York State Urban
Development Corporation was put in charge of redesigning flood-damaged areas.
Its "New Elmira Plan" did not reconstruct the downtown commercial district.
Buildings along Water Street were demolished rather than restored; the site became
a riverfront park. The city lost an estimated 40% of its downtown commercial space
permanently. Corning — also severely flooded — recovered because Corning Inc.
funded and directed its rebuilding. Elmira had no equivalent institutional anchor.
1972–76
Erie Lackawanna Railroad — Flood damage to the main line between
Hornell and Binghamton was severe. The repair cost, on top of years of financial
difficulty, ended the company. The Erie Lackawanna was absorbed into Conrail in 1976.
A major source of industrial employment and freight infrastructure was gone.
The flood is real history, but it's also a convenient explanation.
Elmira's population had already fallen by 6,000 between 1950 and 1970 — two decades
before the flood. The manufacturing contraction and suburban out-migration were
well underway. The flood was a genuine accelerant, and the recovery decisions made
it structurally worse. But it didn't start the decline, and it doesn't fully explain
why the city never recovered while other flood-hit cities did.
Sources: U.S. Census; New York Heritage Agnes Flood exhibit; Chemung County
Historical Society, "The Second Flood of 1972"; NYS Financial Restructuring Board for Local
Governments, City of Elmira Comprehensive Review Report, June 2016
White Flight Outpaced Total Population Loss
The population leaving Elmira was not demographically representative of the people
who stayed. White residents departed at nearly four times the rate of the city's
Black population. This is not incidental — it is the mechanism by which middle-class
homeowners and their property tax payments left, concentrating poverty in the city
that remained.
Between 1970 and 2020, white residents left faster than the city's total
population shrank. The white population fell by 17,525 (−47.8%), but total
population only fell by 13,422 (−33.6%). The gap is explained by the rest of the
city: Black and Hispanic residents held roughly steady or grew slightly, partially
offsetting the departures. Elmira did not shrink because it was losing people across
the board — it shrank because white residents chose to leave.
Year
Total Population
White
White %
Black
Black %
1970
39,945
36,694
91.9%
3,139
7.9%
1980
35,327
31,226
88.4%
3,502
9.9%
1990
33,724
28,815
85.4%
4,162
12.3%
2000
30,123
25,379
84.3%
4,039
13.4%
2010
29,200
22,850
78.3%
4,268
14.6%
2020
26,523
19,169
72.3%
3,960
14.9%
−17,525White residents lost, 1970–2020 (−47.8%)
+821Black residents net change, 1970–2020 (peak 4,268 in 2010)
−13,422Total population loss, 1970–2020 (−33.6%)
Elmira's Black community — historically concentrated in the South Side and along
the Water Street corridor — bore a disproportionate share of the urban renewal
demolitions of the 1960s–70s. The homes demolished for highway construction and
flood recovery were mostly in Black neighborhoods; the residents choosing to leave
for the suburbs were mostly white.
The fiscal consequence of white flight is direct and compounding. Each departing
middle-class homeowner reduced the taxable property base. The city's fixed
costs — police, fire, roads, debt service — don't scale proportionally with
population. Fewer residents paying the same bill means a higher rate per
resident, which in turn makes the city less attractive to the next homeowner
deciding whether to stay or go.
Sources: NHGIS 1970–2020 Decennial Census extracts at Place level (Place = City of Elmira, NY);
ACS 2024 1-year estimate for current figures
The Fiscal Spiral
A shrinking population doesn't produce a proportionally smaller city government.
Roads still need plowing. Police and fire still need staffing. Debt still needs
servicing. When the population paying for those services declines, the rate each
remaining property owner pays must rise — and rising rates make the city less
competitive, driving further departure.
1
Population and commerce decline
Fewer residents, fewer businesses, more vacant and abandoned properties
2
Tax base shrinks
Less taxable value to spread the cost of city services across
3
Fixed costs don't shrink
Public safety, infrastructure, debt service remain substantial
4
Tax rates rise
The levy is spread across fewer properties — each one pays more
5
More residents and businesses leave
Higher taxes make the city less competitive with neighboring municipalities
6
Repeat
Each cycle leaves fewer people carrying a larger share of an unchanged bill
Elmira's property tax rate — measured in dollars owed per $1,000 of a
home's market value — averaged $16.62 between 2009 and 2013. A house worth
$100,000 paid about $1,662 per year in city taxes. That ranked Elmira 9th highest
among all New York State cities, against a statewide median of $10.54. By 2022, the
rate had risen to $23.71 — the same $100,000 house now owed $2,371, a 43% increase
in a decade.
City of Elmira — Property Tax History
Property taxes are measured in dollars per $1,000 of your property's value.
At the 2025 rate of $18.49, a home worth $100,000 owes about $1,849 per year
in city taxes — before school district or county taxes are added on top.
The table tracks how much the city collected each year and what that worked
out to per $1,000 of property value. Before 2013, only a combined rate covering
city, county, and school taxes together is available from state records.
After 2013, the city's own portion is broken out.
Year
City tax levy
Total taxable property
Rate per $1,000 of value
Notes
2003–2012 — combined rate (city + county + school taxes together)
2003
—
—
$13.88
2004
—
—
$14.64
2005
—
—
$15.15
2006
—
—
$15.74
2007
—
—
$16.92
2008
—
—
$17.52
2009
—
—
$18.02
2010
—
—
$18.34
2011
—
—
$18.34
2012
$10,396,290
—
$18.34
2013–2025 — city taxes only (school and county not included)
2013
$10,952,664
$653,357,412
$16.76
2014
$11,589,428
$660,008,678
$17.56
2015
$12,218,938
$706,166,200
$17.30
Sales tax renegotiated
2016
$12,550,996
$704,736,150
$17.81
2017
$13,069,742
$704,523,266
$18.55
2018
$15,157,137
$700,198,696
$21.65
Levy +16% in one year
2019
$14,996,876
$692,884,368
$21.64
2020
$15,199,232
$674,848,575
$22.52
2021
$15,795,004
$682,069,104
$23.16
2022
$15,618,770
$658,605,819
$23.71
Decade high
2023
$15,822,827
$801,564,787
$19.74
State equalization rate revised — see note below
2024
$16,170,243
$851,223,670
$19.00
2025
$16,948,758
$916,687,511
$18.49
The city levy grew from $10.4 million in 2012 to $17.8 million in 2026 — a 71%
increase over 14 years. Inflation accounts for some of that, but not most. The
city's taxable property base was essentially flat from 2013 through 2022 (ranging
between $653M and $706M), meaning the entire rate increase fell on the same pool
of properties.
The 2023 rate drop — from $23.71 to $19.74 — does not reflect a reassessment.
Individual property assessments in Elmira have remained largely frozen. The jump
in total taxable property from $659M to $802M reflects New York State updating
Elmira's equalization rate — its annual estimate of how much frozen assessed values
represent as a share of current market prices. As the housing market recovered
post-COVID, frozen assessments fell further behind market reality, and the state
revised its ratio accordingly. That revision raised the denominator in the rate
calculation. For most property owners whose assessed values didn't change, tax
bills kept rising with the levy.
Starting in 2015, Chemung County and the City of Elmira entered a structured
agreement that exchanged operational support for a smaller share of county sales tax
revenue. That agreement has since been unwound — service by service — while the
city's share of sales tax was never restored.
The original arrangement (2015): The county renegotiated its sales tax
formula, shifting from a 50/50 split with the city to a 66/34 arrangement favoring the
county. The city's share of countywide sales tax fell from roughly 12.33% to 8.17% —
a loss of approximately $3 million per year ($9M to $6M annually). In exchange, the
county assumed responsibility for staffing the city's Department of Public Works and
Buildings & Grounds departments (30–40 employees moved to the county payroll,
costing the county ~$1.5M/year for DPW alone) and gave the city access to the county
health insurance plan.
This was a genuine trade. The city was in acute fiscal distress — its workforce had
fallen to roughly 159 full-time employees, 85% of them police and fire, with ~40 workers
already transferred to the county. Taking on the county's operational support let
the city continue maintaining infrastructure it could no longer staff.
The problem is what happened next. The county has progressively
unwound its side of the agreement while retaining the favorable sales tax split:
2018: Health insurance arrangement terminated — city required to
become self-insured. This led to $2.7 million in unbudgeted cost overruns in
2023–2024 alone.
2021: Buildings and grounds agreement terminated.
2025: Notice to terminate the DPW agreement issued, effective
December 31, 2025. The county executive proposed the city absorb labor costs over
a four-year phase-in.
The Chemung County Legislature sided with the city and blocked the county executive's
termination plan. As of early 2026, the DPW agreement remains in effect under
negotiation.
$23.4MCity's estimated cumulative loss since 2015 — lost sales tax + re-absorbed service costs
−$3M/yrAnnual sales tax shortfall vs. original 50/50 split (~$9M would have been → ~$6M actual)
66 / 34Current county/city sales tax split — unchanged since 2018 despite service terminations
The sales tax renegotiation was identified by Moody's as a primary reason for its
2015 downgrade of Elmira's bonds from A2 to Ba1 — junk status, five notches in a
single action. The city's share of its own county's sales tax was cut at the same
moment its manufacturing base and population were already in long-term decline.
The acute crisis of 2015–2018 has stabilized somewhat, but the structural
conditions have not changed. The city carries a high tax burden, a concentrated
poverty population, and a fiscal position that leaves little margin for the next
disruption.
$2.42MFund balance remaining in 2024 — down from $7.46M in 2023
Ba1Moody's bond rating since 2015 — junk, non-investment grade
$18.49City property tax rate (2025) — $18.49 per $1,000 of value; statewide median was ~$10.54 in 2009–13
The 2023 rate drop is a statistical artifact: the state updated its equalization
rate for Elmira — the ratio it uses to translate frozen assessed values into
market-value equivalents — without any citywide reassessment of individual
properties. Most homeowners' assessed values and tax bills kept climbing. The
structural gap remains: the city taxes a small, frozen base at a high rate to
fund services for a poor population, with limited ability to grow the base or
reduce the fixed costs of government.
The 2026 budget proposed a 12% property tax increase — the direct result of county
service terminations landing on city finances simultaneously. After negotiations, the
increase was cut to approximately 6%. The city's general fund balance, already thin,
fell from $7.46 million in 2023 to $2.42 million in 2024 — a $5 million drawdown in
a single year that leaves almost no cushion for an unplanned expense.
The pattern that produced Elmira's fiscal position took 70 years to build.
It involves the decisions of many levels of government, the movement of private capital,
and the choices of individual households responding to the conditions around them.
None of those forces operate in isolation, and understanding the city's tax burden
requires seeing all of them together.
For a detailed look at the current assessment roll — frozen values, exempt properties,
and what a reassessment would actually mean — see the
City of Elmira fiscal health page.
For how PILOTs from tax-exempt institutions could offset part of the burden, see the
PILOT analysis.
Sources: NYS OSC Fiscal Stress Monitoring System; Moody's 2015 downgrade notice
(via NYS Financial Restructuring Board 2016 report); WSKG December 2025; NYS OSC Local Govts AUD data